Legal Opinion

Marini v. Janus Investment Fund

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 14, 2009No. MDL No. 04-MD-15863; Civil Nos. JFM-04-497, JFM-04-560PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.

In the opinion I issued on December 30, 2008,1 ruled that I would not permit plaintiffs to amend their amended and second amended complaints to assert the claim that “even assuming the mutual fund defendants acted in good faith in attempting to control market timing, defendants are liable under Rule 10b-5 because they knowingly failed to disclose a material fact: the existence of uncontrollable market timing.” In re Mut. Funds Inv. Litig., 590 F.Supp.2d 741, 749-50 (D.Md.2008). Plaintiffs have filed motions for clarification or reconsideration of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nourison Rug Corp. v. ParvizianCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  2. In Re Mutual Funds Inv. LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sharkey IRO/IRA v. Franklin ResourcesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
  2. Christopher Ayash v. David Barnette and Karl HammDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API