Legal Opinion
People v. Seymour
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 28, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*488The prosecution’s evidence was sufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and the minor inconsistencies between the complainant’s description and defendant’s appearance did not render the verdict against the weight of the evidence. Concerning the evidence of a holster recovered from a school bathroom, although such was originally excluded upon the parties’ consent, defendant opened the door to its admission by testifying on direct examination that he did not have a holster and that he went to the school to speak to the principal about his children, and by admitting on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schumer v. HoltzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. FardanNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. FayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People v. MarteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. FreemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. WynnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Matter of Flynn v. DiTullioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- People v. GuinnAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2012