Shelton v. Lemmon

On Motion for Rehearing.

Appellants in their motion for rehearing reassert the. propositions relied on in their brief, and insist that this court committed error in holding in the original opinion that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the finding of the jury that the property in question was not listed with the plaintiffs for sale at the time that negotiations were begun by Lemmon for the sale of the property to Jar-rott brothers and Mrs. Vickers, because the evidence is undisputed that, after the expiration of the 60 days which appellees contended was the time the listing contract was…