Legal Opinion

Mohnsam v. Nemes

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided July 23, 2019No. 3:17-cv-00427Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-427-CRS-CHL KURT K. MOHNSAM, Plaintiff, v. JASON M. NEMES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is the Motion to Compel and for Sanctions of Defendant, Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company (“Acuity”). (DNs 74, 75.) Acuity moves to compel answers to certain interrogatories and requests for production of documents propounded to pro se Defendant, Morgan Bryan Perry (“Perry”), as well as for its costs and attorney’s fees in making the instant Motion. Perry was ordered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Heller v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
  3. Scott v. Arex, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
  4. Gorrell v. SneathDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
  5. Weaver v. Mateer & Harbert, P.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API