Legal Opinion
Atkins v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided July 20, 1967No. Docket 1,020PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLesinski, C. J.
A complaint was filed against plaintiff Samuel Atkins, doing business as Atkins Pharmacy, by Lester and Patricia Ann Farrar. The complaint charged the plaintiff with the negligent sale of pills composed of amobarbital, a habit-forming drug, and subsequent mental and physical injuries to Patricia Ann Farrar as a result thereof.
Subsequently, the plaintiff filed a complaint against Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company alleging that an insurance policy, No. 35C694877, covering the year of October 15, 1962, to October 15, 1963, afforded it coverage for the defense of the Farrar suit. An answer…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brant v. Citizens Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Gorby v. YeomansMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Lavan v. RettingerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sheets v. Brethren Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Central Bearings Co. v. Wolverine Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- American States Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Cobbins v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1972
- Simmons v. Apex Drug Stores, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.