Legal Opinion
Arkansas Land & Lumber Co. v. Cook
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 19, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). The first assignment of error is that the judgment should be reversed because the court gave instruction No. 1, over the objection of the defendant. The instruction is as follows:
“The court instructs the jury that, if you find from a preponderance of the evidence in this case that the plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant company and was working for it under the orders and directions of its foreman, and you find from the evidence that he was in the exercise of ordinary care for his own protection, and you find from the evidence that he had not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. BirdSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. SteelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. MackeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CobbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Hines v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cushing Refining & Gasoline Co. v. DeshanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Lee v. Crittenden CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Manila School Dist. No. 15 v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Great Southern Lumber Co. v. HamiltonMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
- Jonesboro, Lake City & Eastern Railroad v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.