Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Thomas G. Mccuskey

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 18, 2012No. 11–2114PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANSFIELD, Justice.

An attorney continued to practice while his license was temporarily suspended. He also accepted advance fee payments in a matter and did not provide an accounting of earned fees or a refund of unearned fees. In addition, the attorney failed to respond to inquiries from the Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board (Board) or generally cooperate with the disciplinary process.

This case comes before us on the report of a division of the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa (commis sion). See Iowa Ct. R. 35.10QL). 1 The Board alleged the respondent, Thomas G.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. LettSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. MoormanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. John Edward Netti, Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. CaseySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. EarleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Rodney Howard PowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Ronald L. RicklefsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Kenneth F. DolezalSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Mary Ellen KennedySupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Blake D. LubinusSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API