Funston v. Ingenito

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff was injured through the negligent driving of an automobile operated by one Grasso; he sued Louis E. Ingénito, defendant, and recovered a verdict on which judgment was entered; this appeal followed.

There was sufficient evidence to sustain a finding that the car belonged to defendant and that Grasso was in his employ on the day of the accident. Appellant contends, however, that the evidence did not show that the automobile, when it struck plaintiff, was being driven by a servant of defendant or on an undertaking of his; appellee contends to the contrary.

In view of the…