Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Wolfson v. Heins, Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 10, 1942PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITFIELD, J.:

This is a petition under- Rule 34 for interlocutory appeal by certiorari from an order -below denying petitioner’s motions to dismiss the bill of complaint.

The facts alleged in the bill as set out are assumed to be true on this consideration of the motions to dismiss.

It appears that the petitioners, Mitchell Wolfson, et ux., and the respondents, W. C. Heins, et ux., each owned a lot in Beach View Subdivision, Miami Beach, Florida. Both lots fronted on Pine Tree Drive and had their rear boundary on'Indian Creek. On the recorded plat of the subdivision a strip of land fifty feet…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stuart v. StephanusSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Steuart v. State Ex Rel. DolcimascoloSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. Torreyson v. DuttonSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. Dean Ex Rel. v. KaneSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Torreyson v. DuttonSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Homer v. Dadeland Shopping Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1969
  2. Bancroft Investment Corp. v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  3. Alvin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. McNayr v. ClaughtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  5. Engel v. CatucciCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API