Legal Opinion

Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations v. Seitz

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 7, 1952No. 4331PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

The Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations 1 brought this action against N. G. Seitz, B. S. Gladney, and J. W. Gladney 2 to recover possession of, and establish their title to, certain lands that were adjudged to be a part of Oklahoma in the final decree entered in State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 276 U.S. 596, 48 S.Ct. 297, 72 L.Ed. 723, Id., 281 U.S. 109, 694, 50 S.Ct. 247, 74 L.Ed. 731, 1122, settling the boundary line between the states of Oklahoma and Texas.

The complaint alleges that such lands are approximately 700 acres in area, are located in Love County, Oklahoma,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. United States v. RickertSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. George Groundhog v. W. W. KeelerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  2. Poafpybitty v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Narragansett Tribe of Indians v. Southern Rhode Island Land Development Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1976
  4. Navajo Tribe of Indians v. State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. Maryland Casualty Company v. Citizens National Bank of West HollywoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API