Legal Opinion

Peay v. Board of Education of Provo City School District

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1962No. 9722PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Plaintiff as a taxpayer sued to have what is called the “voted leeway” school financing program, enacted by the 1961 Legislature (Chap. 104, S.L.U.1961), adjudged to be unconstitutional; and to have declared void an election held pursuant to it which approved additional school financing for the Provo City School District. The trial court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss and the plaintiff appeals.

The section of that chapter (53-7-24)— all references to statutes correlate to U. C.A. 1953 unless otherwise indicated — with which we are concerned provides in part:

“With the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Norville v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Kent Club v. TorontoUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Morrison-Merrill & Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Glenn v. FerrellUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Dunn v. Bryan, County Clerk Etc.Utah Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Retherford v. AT & T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Clover v. Snowbird Ski ResortUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Zissi v. State Tax Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Amax Magnesium Corp. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API