Legal Opinion

Bruno v. Peyser

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 1976PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Since the order appealed from is in form a reversal, but in fact affirmed the order and judgment of Special Term, leave to appeal is granted by this court sua sponte.

The petitioner, Richard Bruno, instituted this proceeding to contest the election petition of Peter Peyser, a candidate for the Republican nomination for the United States Senate. The respondent did not actually receive the mailed service of process until after the expiration of the 14-day limitation period imposed by subdivision 1 of section 330 of the Election Law. Hence, this proceeding was not timely. (Matter of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pell v. CoveneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. MATTER OF THOMPSON v. New York State Bd. of ElectionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Burton v. CoveneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GarfinkleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Gartner v. SalernoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. MATTER OF THOMPSON v. WallaceNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Zaretski v. TutunjianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Krupczak v. ManciniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API