Legal Opinion

State v. Muldrow

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 21, 2017No. 2016AP740-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHagedorn, J.

f 1. DeAnthony K. Muldrow pled guilty to third-degree sexual assault and sexual assault of a child under sixteen years of age. Nothing in the plea colloquy, however, informed him of the possibility of lifetime GPS monitoring as a consequence of his conviction. Muldrow now seeks plea withdrawal as a matter of right on the grounds that lifetime GPS monitoring is a "punishment" that he must be informed of, the failure of which rendered his plea unknowing and unintelligent in violation of his *228constitutional rights. The circuit court denied Mul-drow's motion for plea withdrawal, and we affirm.

¶ 2.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DeAnthony K. MuldrowWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Kaufman v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API