Legal Opinion

Hausman v. Hausman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated March 29, 1989, as granted those branches of the plaintiff wife’s motion which were for $200 per week in temporary maintenance, $250 per week in temporary child support, $5,000 for pendente lite counsel fees, and $3,925 for pendente lite experts’ fees.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Although the plaintiff earns income as a substitute teacher and as a part-time travel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ahern v. AhernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Van Ess v. Van EssAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Palmer v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Hinden v. HindenNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Zahr v. ZahrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lieberman v. LiebermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Cole v. ColeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API