Zagar v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
| THIBODEAUX, Judge.
Wal-Mart appeals from a judgment against it in this slip and fall case wherein the plaintiff was awarded $3,942.00 for her injuries. We affirm the trial court in all respects. We find that (1) the trial court properly refused to grant Wal-Mart’s motion for an involuntary dismissal; (2) the *588trial court did not commit manifest error or error of law in its application of La.R.S. 9:2800.6; (3) it was not clearly wrong to find that Wal-Mart had constructive notice of the substance in thej^aisle; (4) the plaintiff was not at fault for her accident; (5) it was not error to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Mart v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Housley v. CeriseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lousteau v. K-Mart Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- Tracie Bernard v. Family Dollar Stores of Louisiana, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2005