Seip v. Tilghman
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Atchison District Court. Replevin, brought by Tilghman against Seip, sheriff, etc.,, claiming that certain property levied upon by the defendant was exempt from execution. Trial at the March, Term, 1876,. of the district court, and judgment for plaintiff. The defendant brings the case here. The opinion, contains a sufficient statement of -the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brewer, J.:
This was an action of replevin, brought by defendant in error, claiming that certain property levied on by the plaintiff in error, defendant below, was exempt from execution. The action was commenced .before a justice of the peace, and thence appealed to the district court. Verdict and judgment were in favor of plaintiff, and defendant alleges error. The only pleading was the plaintiff’s bill of particulars. The testimony is not preserved, and we have only the pleading, the answers of the jury to‘special questions, the general verdict, and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shoemaker, Miller & Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Parker v. WigginsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
3Cited by7 opinions
- Buckingham v. DakeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Gentry v. SingletonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Schoenborn v. WilliamsMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Raper v. BlairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Upham v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.