Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Arena

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 3, 2013Published

1Dissent

Scudder, P.J., and Martoche, J.

(dissenting). We respectfully

dissent because we cannot agree with the majority that Supreme Court committed reversible error in refusing to allow defendant to call a defense witness whose testimony was, according to defendant, relevant on the issue of motive. While we recognize the constitutional right of a defendant to present a defense, including presenting his or her own witnesses (see People v Williams, 81 NY2d 303, 312 [1993]), a defendant does not have an unfettered right to offer testimony that is incompetent, privileged or otherwise inadmissible under…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. People v. . HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. People v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API