Bragdon v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBedwell, J.
This cause was tried in the court below upon an agreed statement of facts. There was a finding and judgment for appellees and against appellant. Appellant filed a motion for a new trial in which she specified as reasons, that the decision of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence and that the decision of the court is contrary to law. The sole error assigned is that the trial court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.
The pertinent facts, for an understanding of the question presented for decision, are summarized, as follows:
Appellant’s decedent died on the 1st day…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. RitcheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
- Wokal v. BelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Ruoff v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. YoungIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Thomas v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.