Legal Opinion

Gladstone v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1966No. Claim 37405PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, without costs.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis, Bukke, Scileppi and Beugan. Judge Keating dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: While I agree that there was no negligence proved as to the condition of the high way, the rotted and decayed condition of the guardrails, initially erected between 1913 and 1916, which it was the duty of the State to maintain, justified the award to claimant by the Court of Claims Judge.. The happening of such an accident was foreseeable. There was no evidence of contributory negligence on the part of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Countryman v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. Countryman v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Sanders v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1947
  4. Sanders v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Sanders v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bradley v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Epstein v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API