Legal Opinion
Dweck v. Oppenheimer & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 1, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered on or about August 9, 2005, which, in an action by an investor arising out of his alleged oral acceptance of defendants brokers’ alleged oral offer to sell certain bonds, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiffs causes of action for breach of contract and fraud were properly dismissed on the ground that since he made no payments to defendants, and there being no dispute that the bonds could have been purchased from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stutman v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Sokoloff v. Harriman Estates Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Fesseha v. TD Waterhouse Investor Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Gordon v. Dino De Laurentiis Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Denenberg v. RosenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- M & T Bank Corp. v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2012
- Matter of WilkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Roling v. ETrade Securities LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012