Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Fenstermaker v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 1995No. 21498Published

1Concurrence

LANSING, Judge,

specially concurring.

I concur with parts I and II of the opinion of the Court. I also agree with the ultimate conclusions in Part III that the offense of attempted second degree murder exists in Idaho and that the defendant’s conviction should be upheld. I write separately because, in my view, the rationale stated in the Court’s opinion that intent to kill is always an element of second degree murder is inaccurate and over-simplifies a complex and ill-defined area of Idaho law. I proceed with some reluctance, for an explanation of my disagreement with my colleagues requires a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Danial Siebert v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. AragonIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. DillonIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State v. PrattIdaho Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API