Fenstermaker v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Concurrence
LANSING, Judge,
specially concurring.
I concur with parts I and II of the opinion of the Court. I also agree with the ultimate conclusions in Part III that the offense of attempted second degree murder exists in Idaho and that the defendant’s conviction should be upheld. I write separately because, in my view, the rationale stated in the Court’s opinion that intent to kill is always an element of second degree murder is inaccurate and over-simplifies a complex and ill-defined area of Idaho law. I proceed with some reluctance, for an explanation of my disagreement with my colleagues requires a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Danial Siebert v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. AragonIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. DillonIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. PrattIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.