Legal Opinion
Cannida v. Central Gulf Steamship Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 8, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 68-2725PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN W. LORD, Jr., Chief Judge.
Presently before the Court for determination is defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. First, this Court finds that there are no material facts at issue. Plaintiff was a shore-based handyman, employed and paid as such by Northern Metal Company. He did not belong to a longshore union, did not work as a member of any longshore gang, and was not hired through longshore gang procedures. He had been so employed for a number of years, working a regular work week, rather than longshore daily…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Alaska Steamship Co. v. PettersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Petterson v. Alaska S. S. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Robert Spann v. J. LauritzenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Litwinowicz v. Weyerhaeuser Steamship CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Willie Lee Cannida v. Central Gulf Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971