Legal Opinion

Page v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 19, 1996No. 88535PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review a decision certifying the following question to be of great public importance:

DOES THE DECISION IN CONEY V. STATE, 653 So.2d 1009 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 315, 133 L.Ed.2d 218 (1995), APPLY TO “PIPELINE CASES,” THAT IS, THOSE OF SIMILARLY SITUATED DEFENDANTS WHOSE CASES WERE PENDING ON DIRECT REVIEW OR OTHERWISE NOT YET FINAL WHEN THE OPINION WAS RELEASED?

Page v. State, 677 So.2d 55, 56 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).1 We have, jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We answered this question in Boyett v. State, No. 81,971, — So.2d — [1996 WL 693616] (Fla. Dec. 5,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Boyett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. Page v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Exposito v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Gray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Lookadoo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API