Page v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We have for review a decision certifying the following question to be of great public importance:
DOES THE DECISION IN CONEY V. STATE, 653 So.2d 1009 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 315, 133 L.Ed.2d 218 (1995), APPLY TO “PIPELINE CASES,” THAT IS, THOSE OF SIMILARLY SITUATED DEFENDANTS WHOSE CASES WERE PENDING ON DIRECT REVIEW OR OTHERWISE NOT YET FINAL WHEN THE OPINION WAS RELEASED?
Page v. State, 677 So.2d 55, 56 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).1 We have, jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
We answered this question in Boyett v. State, No. 81,971, — So.2d — [1996 WL 693616] (Fla. Dec. 5,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Boyett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Page v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- Exposito v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Gray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Lookadoo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999