Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Zappolo

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided June 28, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchimmel, J.

The plaintiff, surety under a bond written pursuant to section 83 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law which went into effect April 12, 1933 (Laws of 1933, chap. 180), seeks to recover from the defendant, who is the principal under the bond, the penal sum therein stipulated. Such sum was heretofore paid in full by the plaintiff to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board.

The bond was conditioned upon non-violation by the principal of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law or the rules of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, made pursuant to the law.

The defendant, in his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lyman v. . PerlmutterNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. In re FarleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Matter of Farley v. . BarrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. People ex rel. Hill v. United Surety Co. of BaltimoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. La Nationale v. LavanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1956
  2. Marmorstein v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API