Legal Opinion
Transpac Construction Co., Inc., a California Corporation v. Clark & Groff, Engineers, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 10, 1972No. 25485, 26306PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:
Transpae Construction Co., Inc. (Transpae) brought this Oregon diversity action against Umpqua Basin Water Association, Inc. (Umpqua), Clark & Groff, Engineers, Inc. (Clark & Groff), and Arthur V. Faulkner, to recover damages in the sum of eight hundred and fifteen thousand dollars for negligent and intentional interference with the performance of a contract. The contract is one under which Transpae undertook to install, for Umpqua, a pipeline for a domestic water supply system in Rose-burg, Oregon. Clark & Groff engineered the water supply system and supervised its…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lundgren v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Lester Cox v. City of Freeman, Missouri, and C. Kenneth MaibCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Reynolds v. MerrillUtah Supreme Court · 1969
- Cranford v. McNieceOregon Supreme Court · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Detweiler Bros., Inc. v. John Graham & Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1976
- Hill Ex Rel. Greer v. McDonaldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Owen v. DoddDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1977
- Olson Motor Co. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- McKeny Const. Co., Inc. v. Town of RowlesburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.