Legal Opinion

Marino v. Arandell Corp.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 13, 1998No. 97-C-32PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

ADELMAN, District Judge.

The sole question addressed by this decision is whether the exclusive remedy provision of the Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Act (“WCA” or “Act”) bars the plaintiff Paul Marino’s supplemental invasion of privacy claim, brought under Wisconsin’s right of privacy statute, Wis.Stat. § 895.50 (“privacy statute”).

Paul and Alexis Marino sued Mr. Marino’s employer, Arandell Corporation (“Arandell”), in this forum under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991, alleging intentional…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  5. L.S. Heath & Son, Inc. v. At & T Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Symphony Bronzeville Park, LLCIllinois Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Love v. Med. Coll. of Wis.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2016
  3. Allison Theys, et al. v. Dental Intelligence, Inc., et al.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
  4. FTC-Forward Threat Control, LLC v. Dominion Harbor Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API