Kroger Ltd. Partnership I v. Fee
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN MAUZY PITTMAN, Judge.
|!This is an appeal and cross-appeal from an order of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission. Appellee, Joseph Fee, was employed by appellant, Kroger, when he sustained an admittedly compen-sable injury. After a hearing on appellee’s claim for benefits, the Commission issued a decision finding that all treatment received by appellee through November 15, 2012, was reasonably necessary; that replacement therapy for low testosterone was reasonably necessary to counteract side effects of medicine prescribed for ap-pellee’s compensable injury; that appellee proved…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. PetteySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- White v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. VanWagnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Crudup v. Regal Ware, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Farmers Cooperative v. BilesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arkansas Department of Parks & Tourism v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
- Vann v. FedEx Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018