Legal Opinion

Kroger Ltd. Partnership I v. Fee

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 29, 2014No. CV-13-1129PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN MAUZY PITTMAN, Judge.

|!This is an appeal and cross-appeal from an order of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission. Appellee, Joseph Fee, was employed by appellant, Kroger, when he sustained an admittedly compen-sable injury. After a hearing on appellee’s claim for benefits, the Commission issued a decision finding that all treatment received by appellee through November 15, 2012, was reasonably necessary; that replacement therapy for low testosterone was reasonably necessary to counteract side effects of medicine prescribed for ap-pellee’s compensable injury; that appellee proved…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. PetteySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. White v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. VanWagnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Crudup v. Regal Ware, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Farmers Cooperative v. BilesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arkansas Department of Parks & Tourism v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  2. Vann v. FedEx Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API