Interstate Commerce Commission v. Southern Pac. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California
In Equity. On final hearing. For opinion on demurrer, see 123 Fed. 597. .
1Opinion of the Court
WEEEBORN, District Judge.
This proceeding, brought under sec- ^ tion 16 of the act to regulate commerce (Act Feb. 4, 1887, c. 104, 24 Stat. 384 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3165]); was before me some time ago on demurrer to the complaint, and the order sought to be enforced is set forth in my opinion filed on that hearing and reported in 123 Fed. 598. The defendants are initial carriers for the transportation of citrus fruits of southern California to points on and east of the Missouri river. The termini of the Southern Pacific Company are at Ogden and El Paso. The Santa Fé terminal is at…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Alabama Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati. N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Western New York & P. R. Co. v. Penn Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
- Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962