Legal Opinion

Clifton v. Village of Blanchester

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 2012No. 2010-1196Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Clifton v. Blanchester, 131 Ohio St.3d 287,

2012-Ohio-780.] CLIFTON, APPELLANT, v. VILLAGE OF BLANCHESTER, APPELLEE. [Cite as Clifton v. Blanchester, 131 Ohio St.3d 287,

2012-Ohio-780.] Appropriation—Zoning—Regulatory taking—Standing of owner of property outside territory of zoning authority—Inverse condemnation. (No. 2010-1196—Submitted September 6, 2011—Decided March 1, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Clinton County, No. CA2009-07-009,

2010-Ohio-2309. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT A property owner lacks standing to bring a regulatory-taking claim against a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API