Hill v. Mathewson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Shit for the foreclosure of a lien for materials furnished in the erection of a house and barn for the defendant; brought to the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County. The complaint contained two counts.
Read the full summary
Shit for the foreclosure of a lien for materials furnished in the erection of a house and barn for the defendant; brought to the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County. The complaint contained two counts. The first alleged that the defendant was owner of a certain piece of land in the town of Norwalk, which was described, and on which were a dwelling-house and barn , that the plaintiff had furnished materials for, and which were used in, the construction of the house and barn, under an agreement made on the 26th of May, 1885, with one J. M. Sanger, who was the contractor with the defendant…
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
The plaintiff, a lumber dealer, contracted with one Sanger, a builder, who had contracted with the defendant to build for him a house and barn, to furnish lumber for the erection of the buildings. He commenced furnishing materials on the 26th day of May, 1885, and continued so to do under the same agreement until the first day of October. Not being paid m full, on the 9fch day of October he gave the defendant written notice that he commenced furnishing materials on the 26th day of May and ceased doing so on the 1st day of October; that the value of the *330materials so furnished was $1,155.50;…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Walton v. Dayton Hotel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Banking Center v. GoodrichConnecticut Superior Court · 1976
- Banking Center v. GoodrichConnecticut Superior Court · 1976