Legal Opinion
Bauer v. City of Newark
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 18, 1951PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hehee, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court dismissing the complaint in this action ex contractu as deficient in the statement of a cause of action. The complaint is in two counts: the first alleges that on January 24, 1947, the City of Newark, ££by its Mayor, Yincent J. Murphy, and its Corporation Counsel, Thomas. L. Parsonnet, engaged the plaintiff as an expert economist, for the agreed compensation of $15,000,” to act on its behalf in the telephone rate ease then pending before the Board of Public Utility Commissioners of New…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Campbell v. City of HackensackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Samuel v. Borough of South PlainfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
- Ballagh Realty Co. v. Borough of DumontSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
3Cited by24 opinions
- VF Zahodiakin Engineering Corp. v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF SUMMITSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Casamasino v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Saint Barnabas Medical Center v. County of EssexSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- McKenna v. New Jersey Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Johnson v. Hospital Service Plan of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.