Legal Opinion
Joseph Mauz v.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 13, 2017No. 16-1250UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION **
MCKEE, Circuit Judge.
Joseph Mauz appeals the District Court’s order affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s decision holding Mauz’s $217,100 debt owed to Appellees William and Kimberly Link not dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) because it arose from a willful and malicious injury. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm the ruling of the District Court.
I
This case arises from ongoing hostility between Mauz and the Links, who were adjoining property owners. Over the years, Mauz filed ten complaints against the Links in state court. Each was either dismissed, withdrawn, or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Dominick P. CONTE, Debtor, Dominick P. CONTE, Appellant v. Urmila GAUTAM; Narinder Gautam; U.S. Trustee, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Schubert v. Lucent Technologies Inc. (In Re Winstar Communications, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- In Re: Barry L. Michael v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- In Re: Fruehauf Trailer Corporation, Debtor Pension Transfer Corp. v. Beneficiaries Under the Third Amendment to Fruehauf Trailer Corporation Retirement Plan No. 003 Fruehauf Trailer Corporation Retirement Plan, Plan No. 003 Beneficiaries Under the Third Amendment to Fruehauf Trailer Corporation Retirement Plan No. 003, and Steven F. Hollrah and Steve Havens, as Class RepresentativesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- In Re Goody's Family Clothing Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gallo v. Palmiter (In re Palmiter)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION v. AdesanyaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- TH PROPERTIES v. OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025