Legal Opinion
Arce v. Wackenhut Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 10, 2014No. 3D12-2807PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEmas, J.
Tony Arce (“Arce”) seeks reversal of an order awarding appellate attorney’s fees and costs in favor of Wackenhut Corporation (“Wackenhut”). Wackenhut cross-appeals, seeking reversal of the lower court’s order vacating a prior order determining it was entitled to trial court fees and costs. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the lower court’s order awarding appellate fees and costs in favor of Wackenhut, and reverse the lower court’s order vacating the trial fees entitlement order, and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS
Arce was employed by Wackenhut from March 2008, until he resigned on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- TGI Friday's, Inc. v. DvorakSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Civ. Proc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Fox v. McCaw Cellular CommunicationsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY v. WeinsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Specialty Restaurants Corp. v. ElliottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Castiglioni v. PinoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Lloyd Oliver Hunt v. State Farm Florida Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024