Legal Opinion

Newman Oil Co. v. Alkek

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 13, 1979No. 20068PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUITTARD, Chief Justice.

Appellants, plaintiffs in the trial court, have appealed from an order sustaining a plea of privilege. They now move to reverse and remand on the ground that after they perfected the appeal, appellees waived their plea of privilege by serving a notice to take a series of depositions. We overrule the motion on the ground that Rule 88, Tex.R.Civ.P., expressly provides: “Issuing process for witnesses and taking depositions shall not constitute a waiver of a plea of privilege . . .

Appellants contend that this rule applies only to depositions taken for the purpose of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Howe Grain & Mercantile Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Preissman v. Allied Bank of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Texas Land & Development Co. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newman Oil Co. v. AlkekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Newman Oil Co. v. Alkek, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
  3. Double Diamond-Delaware, Inc., Double Diamond, Inc., White Bluff Club Corporation, National Resort Management Company, R. Michael Ward, Fred Curran, and White Bluff Property Owners Association, Inc. v. Jeanette Alfonso, Eugenio Corpus, Fe Huevos, Elezar Nuique, Editha and Reynaldo Pepito, Simonette and Julito Pepito, Cherry Somosot, and Nelia Vicente, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015
  4. in Re 8650 Frisco, LLC D/B/A Estilo Gaucho Brazilian Steakhouse, Mandona, LLC, Galovelho, LLC, Bahtche, LLC, Claudio Nunes and David Jeiel Rodrigues, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API