Legal Opinion

Rochester Pure Waters District v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 22, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 91-1540-LFOPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

OBERDORFER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Monroe County, N.Y., the City of Rochester, N.Y., and the city’s water district (collectively “Rochester”), brought this action to compel defendant, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), to fund certain expenses that arose, out of litigation relating to Rochester’s construction work on a sewage treatment plant in the early 1970s. Currently pending are EPA’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment and Rochester’s motion for partial summary judgment. For the reasons stated in this Memorandum, the accompanying Order dismisses all of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API