Legal Opinion

Tyler v. Citizens Home Bank of Greenfield

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1984No. 13225PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROW, Judge.

Appellant (“Tyler”) sued three defendants: Eugene Eisert (“Eugene”), Eugene’s wife, Katherine N. Eisert (“Katherine”), and Citizens Home Bank of Greenfield, Missouri (“the Bank”).

The Bank filed a motion to dismiss Tyler’s petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, Rule 55.27(a)(6),1 or for summary judgment in favor of the Bank on the ground that there were no genuine issues of material fact and the Bank was entitled to judgment in its favor as a matter of law, Rule 74.04(c).

After arguments on the motion, the trial court entered an order providing, in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Scheibel v. HillisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Hasemeier v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  3. Parker v. ShermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. State Ex Rel. Strohfeld v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  5. Columbia Casualty Co. v. Westmoreland CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anchor Centre Partners, Ltd. v. Mercantile Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Huber v. Magna Bank of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Hutchens v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API