Legal Opinion
Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 4, 2003No. CIV.A.96-2296-KHVPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Kustom Signals, Inc. (“Kus-tom”) brought suit against Applied Concepts, Inc. and John L. Aker, alleging that they infringed its patent for a police traffic radar. Defendants denied infringement and claimed that the patent was invalid. The Court granted defendants’ summary judgment motion on Kustom’s claim of infringement and certified the ruling for appeal under Rule 54(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. The Federal Circuit affirmed this Court’s judgment and denied Kustom’s petition for rehearing. The Supreme Court denied Kus- tom’s petition for a writ of…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Raymond J. Van Skiver Alma L. Van Skiver v. United States of America and John DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wagner Equipment Co. v. WoodDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- Gonzalez v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Charles v. Nabors Drilling USA LPDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2023
- El Aemer El Mujaddid v. Lynn A. WehlingDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- Farrell v. DetavisDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.