Legal Opinion

Buckley v. Schaul

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 22, 2005No. 04-35426; D.C. No. CV-03-03234-TSZPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Richard E. Buckley, an attorney formerly employed by the Social Security Administration (“SSA”), appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing his action alleging that the SSA and individual employees of the SSA and the Department of Justice violated the access provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, by not providing him with documents that he requested. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Farrell v. Principi, 366 F.3d 1066, 1067 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm.

We do not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Inc. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. David L. Farrell v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gerald Richardson v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API