Legal Opinion

Holmes v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1974No. State 187PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

Two issues are raised on appeal by court-appointed counsel for the defendant: (1) That the trial together of separate charges was error; and (2) that failure to submit a requested instruction and verdict of endangering safety by conduct regardless of life was error. Each claim of error will be separately considered.

Trial together of separate charges.

Under Wisconsin statutory law a court may order two or more complaints, informations or indictments to be tried together if the crimes and defendants could “. . . have been joined in a single complaint, information or indictment . ...” Two or more…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PetersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. State v. BergenthalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Peterson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Nelson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. MelvinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Peters v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. SheldonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Holmes v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Bailey v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Fells v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API