Courtright v. Common Council
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Eelator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to approve his liquor bond. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
This is an application for a mandamus to compel respondent to approve relator’s bond as a retail dealer in liquors.
Eelatqr is carrying on a hotel in the village of Newaygo known as “ The Courtright,” having a frontage of 175 feet on the main street, and which is wholly occupied by relator. It is insisted by respondent that relator has for some years operated, and now proposes to operate, two separate bars in said hotel, — one on the first floor, and one in the basement, — both of which have independent entrances from the *292street, and also from the alley in the rear of the hotel, and both of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hochstadler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Commonwealth v. McCormickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- City of St. Louis v. GerardiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
- People v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Commonwealth v. StrattonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Malkan v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1901