Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Berryhill

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 14, 2017No. 16-1402UnpublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Paul J. Kelly, , Jr., Circuit Judge

The Rocky Mountain Disability Law Group (the law firm), as the real party in interest, appeals from the district court’s order to refund $4,750 in fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) to its client, Marie Martinez. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Background

In 2009, Ms. Martinez signed a contingent-fee agreement for the law firm to represent her in proceedings to obtain Social Security disability benefits. Under the agreement, Ms. Martinez agreed that the firm was entitled to a fee for work at the administrative…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Servants of the Paraclete v. DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. McGraw v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. Phelps v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  5. Jennings v. RiversCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kathleen O'Donnell v. Andrew SaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. (SS)Martinez v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. Amy J. Searles v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2026
  4. Bumgarner v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
  5. Cheri M. Hydock-Dicosimo v. Frank J. BisignanoDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API