Martinez v. Berryhill
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Paul J. Kelly, , Jr., Circuit Judge
The Rocky Mountain Disability Law Group (the law firm), as the real party in interest, appeals from the district court’s order to refund $4,750 in fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) to its client, Marie Martinez. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Background
In 2009, Ms. Martinez signed a contingent-fee agreement for the law firm to represent her in proceedings to obtain Social Security disability benefits. Under the agreement, Ms. Martinez agreed that the firm was entitled to a fee for work at the administrative…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Servants of the Paraclete v. DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- McGraw v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Phelps v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Jennings v. RiversCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kathleen O'Donnell v. Andrew SaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- (SS)Martinez v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Amy J. Searles v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2026
- Bumgarner v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Cheri M. Hydock-Dicosimo v. Frank J. BisignanoDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.