Legal Opinion

In the Interest of J.A.G.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 15, 2000No. 04-98-00875-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by:

TOM RICKHOFF, Justice.

The trial court determined that Luis Zamudio is J.A.G.’s father and ordered him to pay $200 in monthly child support and $4275 in retroactive child support. Zamudio appeals. We affirm.

Zamudio argues the trial court erred in ordering him to pay child support because he is incarcerated and indigent. The proceedings in this case were electronically recorded. Zamudio did not request the court recorder to file the record in this court, did not include an appendix to his brief containing a transcription of relevant portions of the record, and did not file a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holt v. F.F. Enterprises, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
  2. Ford v. Whitehead, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  3. Utley v. Marathon Oil Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Newton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  2. D. Andrew Tait v. Pepsico Inc. D/B/A Pepsi Beverage Co., Dr Pepper Snapple Group, and John Peter Smith Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2023
  3. In the Interest of D.B. and G.B., Children v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2023
  4. Jimmy L. Hilliard v. Sheila Marie Holland and the Office of the Attorney General, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
  5. Jimmy L. Hilliard v. Sheila Marie Holland and the Office of the Attorney General, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API