Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Jones v. Russi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Petitioner is not entitled to habeas corpus relief because, even assuming that his arguments have merit, he would not be entitled to immediate release from custody (see, People ex rel. Kaplan v Commissioner of Correction of City of N. Y., 60 NY2d 648). Although he has the right to be considered for parole, he does not have the right to be granted parole (see, Correction Law § 805; Matter of Walker v Russi, 176 AD2d 1185, lv dismissed 79 NY2d 897). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Contiguglia, J.—Habeas Corpus.) Present—…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Kaplan v. Commissioner of CorrectionNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Walker v. RussiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brim v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Brim v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Brim v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. McGivern v. DonnellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API