Layssard v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
YELVERTON, Judge.
Charles Layssard sued his employer, Procter and Gamble Manufacturing Company, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act seeking benefits for total and permanent disability, together with statutory penalties and attorney’s fees. From a judgment finding plaintiff presently working in substantial pain and partially disabled, both the defendant and the plaintiff have appealed. We affirm.
The only issue raised by defendant on appeal is whether the trial court erred in finding the plaintiff suffered from substantial pain as a result of the injury. The only issue raised by plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oster v. Wetzel Printing, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- Lattin v. Hica Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Newell v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- Augustine v. COURTNEY CONST. CO., ETC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- McBroom v. Argonaut Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Long v. Manville Forest Products Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- Layssard v. Proctor & Gamble Mfg. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- Layssard v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986