Legal Opinion

Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company v. Charles A. Brecheisen

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 30, 1963No. 7202PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company appeals from an adverse and summary judgment entered in the District of Kansas and holding that Panhandle’s alleged claim was barred by Kansas statutory limitation applicable to contract actions not based upon written instruments. Panhandle asserts that the court erred in concluding that its cause of action was not based upon a written contract and, in the alternative, that its action was commenced within the statutory time limitation applicable to implied contracts. 1 The latter contention requires an interpretation of Rule 12(b),…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Superior Court of Del. for New Castle Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Greenshields v. Warren Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  5. Tate v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lightcap v. Mobil Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  2. Haley v. HershbergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  3. Waechter v. Amoco Production Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  4. Marlin Maxwell v. Hyson SwainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API