Simonoko v. Stop & Shop, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs, husband and wife, appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint in this tort action. The judge considered the case on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. In effect, the parties stipulated to the evidence most favorable to the plaintiffs. The wife stepped on a bottom shelf in the defendant’s store to reach a bottle at the back of a top shelf, and, as she came down, she caught her nose on a hook about five inches long. The hook, which was attachable "by a squeezing action,” was of a type used to display merchandise at the defendant’s store and at other stores,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Letiecq v. Denholm & McKay Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Bristol Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Municipal Lighting Plant Commission of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Mudge v. Stop & Shop, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- St. Rock v. GagnonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Rosenston v. Bickford Shoes, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boylston-Washington, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Associated Health Care Group, Inc. v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
- Atwood v. NolanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984
- Demirgian v. Star Market Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1995