Legal Opinion
Harris v. National MacHine Works, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 18, 1948No. 3630PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.
National Machine Works, Inc., 1 and Gerner brought this action against Harris and Calhoun, copartners doing business under the name of H-C Products Company, for infringement of Patent 2,403,520, and for unfair competition. The patent was applied for July 23, 1945, and granted July 9, 1946.
Gerner was an automobile mechanic. Harris was a salesman for automotive parts. Gerner conceived and designed a unit for repairing Chevrolet automobile transmissions. He worked out designs, drawings, and a rough model of the unit, which, in September, 1944, he disclosed to Harris. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Williams Manufacturing Co. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Florence-Mayo Nuway Co. v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Williams Iron Works Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Zero Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Mississippi Milk Producers AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Admiral Corporation v. Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Oliver United Filters, Inc. v. SilverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Bewal, Inc., a Corporation of Kansas and Benjamine C. Edwards, Jr. v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.