Legal Opinion

Marks v. City of Roseburg

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 12, 1983No. E80-1783; CA A27195PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Plaintiffs appeal and defendant cross-appeals from a judgment declaring defendant’s occult arts ordinance to be valid and enjoining plaintiffs from engaging in the practice of palmistry for hire or profit in Roseburg. Plaintiffs brought an action for declaratory judgment, alleging that defendant’s occult arts ordinance on its face violated their rights under several provisions of the Oregon and United States Constitutions. Plaintiffs prayed for a judgment declaring the ordinance unconstitutional, enjoining defendant from enforcing the ordinance and awarding plaintiffs their reasonable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Deras v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Spiritual Psychic Science Church of Truth, Inc. v. City of AzusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Johnson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Spiritual Psychic Science Church of Truth, Inc. v. City of AzusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API