Legal Opinion

Lynch v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 16, 1993No. CR-91-934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ON RETURN TO REMAND

McMILLAN, Judge.

This court remanded this case to the trial court with instructions to make “specific findings of fact” relating to the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel presented by the petitioner, Richard Lynch, Lynch v. State, 620 So.2d 748 (Ala.Cr.App.1992). Pursuant to those instructions, the trial court issued the following findings of fact:

“1. With regard to [the petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim], generally, the Court finds that the Defendant was represented effectively by each of his attorneys;
“2. That [the first defense attorney] has…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lynch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Adkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API