Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Henderson v. Rice

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 20, 1931No. 13125Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Cothran

(concurring in result) : I concur in the result, upon this ground: I do not consider it necessary, or even proper, to construe the complaint as alleging a cause of action for a reformation of the note. If the plaintiff can sustain his allegation that the loan was really made to the defendant indorsers, that, though apparently occupying the position of technical indorsers, the note was given for their accommodation, that they actually received the proceeds of the note, and were the actual paymasters of the note, matters susceptible of proof by parol evidence, the defense that they received no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. Traxler Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  2. Commercial Nat'l Bank v. Ashley Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  3. Rogers v. PalmerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API